Table 1 Comparison of the absorption performance among different metamaterial absorber configurations.
Ref | Bandwidth (GHz) | Absorption | Lumped elements/Mutilayer | Polarization (Both TE and TM?) | Incident angle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peaks at 14.5, 16.5 | > 90% | No/No | Both | 0, 45°, 90° | |
4.68–13 | > 80% | Yes/No | Both | 0–15° | |
4.52–25.42 | > 80% | Yes/Yes | Both | 0–15° | |
9–15 | > 80 | Yes/No | Both | 0–45° | |
11.21–11.49 13.92–14.85 17.66–17.87 | > 90% | No/No | Both | 0–45° | |
13.40–14.25 | > 90% | No/Yes | Both | 0–30° | |
This paper | 12.4–14.55 | > 90% | No/No | Both | 0–45° |
