Table 1 Reduction rates of the hemodynamic parameters according to the size of the parent artery.

From: Quantitative analysis of hemodynamic changes induced by the discrepancy between the sizes of the flow diverter and parent artery

Parent artery diameter (mm)

MCR (%)

Pore density

(Pores/mm2)

Energy loss (W/m3)

(Reduction rate %)

Avg. velocity (m/s)

(Reduction rate %)

Inflow rate (mm3/s)

(Reduction rate %)

Pipeline diameter (mm)

Parent artery (3.0)

0

5235 (0.00)

0.0219 (0.00)

473.4 (0.00)

Pipeline (4.0)

25.5

28.5

2566 (50.99)

0.00923 (57.81)

202.4 (57.25)

Parent artery (3.5)

0

855.8 (0.00)

0.0169 (0.00)

285.7 (0.00)

Pipeline (4.0)

29.4

31.9

409.2 (52.19)

0.00330 (80.46)

81.98 (71.30)

Parent artery (4.0)

0

517.9 (0.00)

0.0116 (0.00)

232.9 (0.00)

Pipeline (4.0)

37.2

45.5

228.0 (55.98)

0.00192 (83.43)

54.82 (76.46)

Parent artery (4.5)

0

313.5 (0.00)

0.00859 (0.00)

167.1 (0.00)

Pipeline (4.0)

48.0

73.5

137.6 (56.12)

0.00137 (84.01)

38.40 (77.02)

  1. MCR metal coverage rate.