Table 3 Computational and parametric quantities comparison of experiment results on CDD and WHU-CD.

From: DASUNet: a deeply supervised change detection network integrating full-scale features

Method type

Network

Params(M)

Gflops(G)

CDD

WHU-CD

Train_Epoch(S)

Test_Epoch(S)

Train_Epoch(S)

Test_Epoch(S)

CNN

FC-EF

1.35

3.58

578.95

61.62

354.50

18.25

FC-Siam-conc

1.55

5.33

676.39

65.77

351.09

17.52

FC-Siam-diff

1.35

4.73

685.02

70.45

356.32

17.25

L-UNet

8.45

17.33

870.42

98.04

443.59

23.78

IFNet

35.99

82.27

893.78

115.45

450.91

28.96

SNUNet-24

6.77

30.90

873.24

103.89

470.66

26.31

USSFC-Net

1.52

4.86

830.91

90.23

430.95

23.44

TinyCD

0.29

1.54

704.65

80.57

329.30

20.92

DASUNet-32

2.27

25.61

1022.98

135.88

515.98

34.12

DASUNet-64

9.07

100.93

1731.19

226.62

874.34

56.94

Transformer

ChangeFormer

29.84

11.65

688.44

77.17

347.97

17.81

IDET

45.09

124.19

1232.82

126.14

669.25

32.28

ScratchFormer

36.92

196.59

2690.59

291.41

1387.35

71.66

Swin-UNet-CD

27.15

7.75

534.23

70.77

316.49

18.63

  1. The best two results are in bold and italics, respectively.
  2. Train_Epoch indicates the training time per epoch, and Test_Epoch indicates the time for each epoch of testing.