Table 5 Optimization results of the optimization algorithms for the WDN.
TEP model | Measure | SCHO | WO | SGA | TTAO | EEFO | KOA | DBO | SHO | SRS | WSO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O.F1 | Best | 401.96 | 402.67 | 404.94 | 401.22 | 401.84 | 401.22 | 402.37 | 401.22 | 406.72 | 402.34 |
Worst | 416.02 | 410.12 | 434.92 | 407.11 | 416.98 | 405.46 | 420.07 | 412.07 | 423.21 | 414.92 | |
Average | 408.69 | 406.59 | 419.55 | 402.78 | 408.03 | 402.11 | 407.76 | 405.94 | 418.05 | 407.56 | |
Time (s) | 64.20 | 67.79 | 61.86 | 118.52 | 74.52 | 66.23 | 58.63 | 91.02 | 56.21 | 27.35 | |
O.F2 | Best | 400.09 | 396.84 | 404.25 | 395.69 | 400.42 | 393.35 | 397.36 | 396.72 | 418.35 | 400.62 |
Worst | 411.38 | 407.72 | 438.28 | 402.45 | 410.64 | 400.39 | 412.56 | 406.82 | 429.92 | 413.58 | |
Average | 404.72 | 401.92 | 421.79 | 398.20 | 405.30 | 395.81 | 404.39 | 402.97 | 424.56 | 406.94 | |
Time (s) | 76.4 | 81.61 | 70.169 | 131.72 | 88.24 | 77.63 | 67.43 | 103.88 | 66.54 | 35.4 | |
O.F3 | Best | 401.91 | 397.30 | 403.41 | 396.74 | 400.73 | 394.85 | 398.11 | 397.12 | 407.52 | 401.5497 |
Worst | 414.48 | 411.54 | 431.62 | 401.67 | 413.86 | 403.33 | 413.77 | 406.94 | 429.69 | 411.0904 | |
Average | 406.71 | 402.89 | 414.10 | 397.98 | 406.60 | 396.45 | 404.72 | 401.87 | 422.38 | 406.5078 | |
Time (s) | 81.04 | 85.06 | 75.63 | 134.05 | 92.89 | 81.84 | 70.22 | 105.17 | 70.05 | 38.33 |
