Table 1 Statistical analysis results of behavioral data from Pavlovian conditioned approach baseline and reward omission session on sign-tracking female rats.

From: Adolescent alcohol exposure persistently alters orbitofrontal cortical encoding of Pavlovian conditional stimulus components in female rats

I Behavioral parameters

Variable

Effect

Exp(B)

P

Confidence interval Lower Upper

Lever presses

Exposure

1.267

0.56

0.561

2.859

Session

1.426

0.43

0.591

3.443

Exp*Session

0.885

0.88

0.376

3.110

Lever latency

Exposure

0.948

0.98

0.005

190.2

Session

0.009

0.12

0.001

3.425

Exp*Session

0.585

0.88

0.000

1055

Lever probability

Exposure

0.910

0.08

0.818

1.012

Session

1.255

 < 0.001

1.123

1.404

Exp*Session

1.099

0.19

0.954

1.266

Receptacle probability

Exposure

0.870

0.08

0.741

1.021

Session

1.514

 < 0.001

1.289

1.778

Exp*Session

0.985

0.88

0.801

1.212

RE 10 s after CS offset

Exposure

0.872

0.138

0.586

1.300

Session

0.804

0.352

0.547

1.180

Exp*Session

2.041

0.016

1.141

3.653

RE latency after CS offset

Exposure

1.529

0.230

-1,53

0,391

Session

32.17

 < 0.001

-3,00

-1,391

Exp*Session

2.226

0.151

-1,53

0,391

Variable

Effect

F

P

Df

Elevation score

Exposure

0.875

0.360

1

__

Session

0.692

0.415

  

Exp*Session

1.240

0.278

  

LP 10 s after CS onset and 10 s before CS offset on baseline session

Exposure

0.660

0.426

1

 

Time

13.24

0.001

  

Exp*Time

0.176

0.678

  

LP 10 s after CS onset and 10 s before CS offset on omission session

Exposure

0.014

0.906

1

 

Time

8.221

0.009

  

Exp*Time

0.073

0.788

  

RE 10 s after CS onset and 10 s before CS offset on baseline session

Exposure

0.508

0.484

1

 

Time

8.853

0.007

  

Exp*Time

0.059

0.809

  

RE 10 s after CS onset and 10 s before CS offset on omission session

Exposure

0.579

0.455

1

 

Time

2.559

0.125

  

Exp*Time

0.015

0.903

  
  1. Behavioral analyses were conducted using a generalized linear model with a Poisson distribution and a log link function or using a two-way ANOVA depending on the data distribution. Group comparison on lever presses 10 s before CS offset were performed using Mann–Whitney U test or t-test depending on data distribution. Underlined bold type indicates significant differences (p values are described on the table). Italics bold type indicates marginal differences (see methods). CS (conditional stimulus); Exp (exposure); LP (lever presses); RE (receptacle entries).