Table 6 Influence of family life cycle on the willingness of residents to locate their dwellings.

From: Residents’ future residential preference and its affecting factors in the rapid urbanization zone of rural China from a family life cycle perspective

Independent variable

Ancestral house

Current rural house

Children’s house in the village

Children’s house in the city

Collinearity test

B

Significance

OR

B

Significance

OR

B

Significance

OR

B

Significance

OR

Tolerance

VIF

Initial stage

0.30

0.74

1.35

4.42**

0.00

83.34

1.02

0.26

2.76

− 1.37

0.23

0.25

0.71

1.41

Burden stage

0.32

0.68

1.38

3.79**

0.00

44.40

0.72

0.38

2.06

− 1.01

0.29

0.36

Stable stage

− 0.48

0.47

0.62

1.66**

0.01

5.23

0.70

0.33

2.02

0.19

0.80

1.21

Maintenance stage

− 0.38

0.62

0.69

2.22**

0.00

9.21

2.88**

0.00

17.80

− 1.57

0.11

0.21

Empty-nest stage

Reference

HHA

0.02

0.49

1.02

0.08**

0.00

1.08

0.10**

0.00

1.10

− 0.06

0.11

0.94

0.57

1.76

HEAL (very poor and poor)

−0.17

0.86

0.84

0.34

0.64

1.40

-0.89

0.35

0.41

− 1.64

0.13

0.19

0.44

2.27

HEAL (general)

0.31

0.68

1.36

− 0.07

0.90

0.93

− 1.93*

0.03

0.15

− 1.54

0.08

0.22

HEAL (good)

0.22

0.73

1.24

− 0.24

0.63

0.79

− 1.19

0.10

0.31

− 1.67*

0.03

0.19

HEAL (very good)

Reference

EDU

0.01

0.93

1.01

− 0.06

0.24

0.94

− 0.09

0.22

0.92

0.01

0.90

1.01

0.57

1.75

HAI

− 0.20

0.15

0.98

− 0.01

0.41

0.99

− 0.01

0.33

0.99

− 0.11*

0.01

0.90

0.87

1.15

DEG (rapid or slow decrease)

− 0.41

0.64

0.66

0.36

0.25

1.43

1.94*

0.04

6.96

− 0.43

0.69

0.65

0.57

1.76

DEG (constant)

− 0.29

0.63

0.74

0.03

0.95

1.03

1.35

0.08

3.87

− 1.20

0.15

0.30

DEG (slow growth)

0.01

0.98

1.01

0.33

0.48

1.39

1.09

0.12

2.96

− 0.84

0.23

0.43

DEG (rapid growth)

Reference

LP (solitary)

− 0.75

0.16

0.47

1.83**

0.00

6.23

17.69**

0.00

1.02

− 5.16

0.12

1.33

0.90

1.11

LP (two-generation cohabiting)

− 1.35**

0.01

0.26

1.72**

0.00

5.60

10.26*

0.01

1.48

− 3.25**

0.00

0.04

LP (three-generation cohabiting)

Reference

NC

− 0.01

0.95

0.99

− 0.04

0.82

0.96

0.45

0.54

1.16

0.04

0.88

1.04

0.96

1.05

VL (1 -10 km)

1.33

0.17

3.79

− 0.94**

0.00

0.39

− 0.13

0.86

0.88

1.06

0.16

2.90

0.85

1.18

VL (11–20 km)

1.99*

0.03

7.31

0.61

0.20

1.83

0.09

0.89

1.09

2.61**

0.00

13.60

VL (20km-30km)

3.70**

0.00

40.55

− 0.18

0.51

0.83

0.25

0.70

1.28

0.11

0.84

1.12

VL (30km-40km )

Reference

NH

0.09

0.73

1.10

0.04

0.89

1.04

− 0.06

0.87

0.94

0.75*

0.04

2.11

0.95

1.06

AL

− 0.16**

0.00

0.85

− 0.01

0.96

0.99

− 0.07

0.00

0.93

− 0.03

0.48

0.97

0.87

1.15

Nagelkerke Pseudo R-squared

0.76

             

F

9.57

             

Sig

0.00

             
  1. Note: The elderly care facility is the reference item of the model. Reference means that other variables in this category refer to this variable. OR: Odd Ratio. * Significant at p < 0.05. ** Significant at p < 0.01.
  2. HHA, Household head Age; HEAL, Health; EDU, Education; HAI, Household annual income; DEG, Degree of household economic growth (latest 5 years); LP, Living pattern; NC, Number of children; VL, Village location; NH, Number of homesteads owned; AL, Acres of land owned.
Back to article page