Table 3 The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was utilized to assess the quality and strength of the included outcomes (i.e., American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society [AOFAS] scores, Intermetatarsal Angle [IMA], Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle [DMAA], and Hallux Valgus Angle [HVangle]) in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

From: Radiological and functional outcomes of Reverdin Isham osteotomy in moderate Hallux Valgus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

Summary of findings

 

Quality of evidence synthesis (GRADE)

k

n

Effect (95% CI)

Direction effect compared to baseline

Imprecision

Inconsistency

Risk of bias

Overall quality

AOFAS scores

AOFAS scores

7

554

3.29 (1.66–4.92)

None

− 1

− 1

Very Low

IMA scores

IMA scores

7

554

− 1.06 (− 1.55 to − 0.58)

None

− 1

− 1

Very Low

DMAA scores

DMAA scores

6

543

− 1.05 (− 1.62 to − 0.47)

None

− 1

− 1

Very Low

HVangle

HVangle

6

543

− 2.05 (− 2.54 to − 1.57)

None

− 1

− 1

Very Low

  1. AOFAS BL American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society, IMA Intermetatarsal Angle, DMAA Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle, HVangle BL Hallux Valgus Angle, k number of studies, n number of feet.