Table 1 Impact of agronomic and nutrient management options on yield attributes and yield of aromatic rice cultivar Tulaipanji.

From: Enhancing aromatic rice production through agronomic and nutritional management for improved yield and quality

Treatments

Effective tillers m−2

Panicle length (cm)

No. of grain panicle−1

Filled grain panicle−1

Test weight (g)

Grain yield (t ha−1)

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

Agronomic management options

 AM1

268.66

281.98

23.51

23.62

91.62

92.41

83.06

85.48

13.81

13.86

2.59

2.62

 AM2

208.08

235.95

20.20

20.91

70.01

74.46

60.17

66.37

13.06

13.26

1.44

1.61

 AM3

226.77

252.05

21.60

21.71

85.41

86.83

73.45

75.16

13.38

13.42

1.88

2.06

 SE m (±)

13.20

12.45

0.32

0.27

1.51

1.24

2.04

0.89

0.15

0.18

0.17

0.09

 CD (P = 0.05)

51.83

48.88

1.27

1.04

5.92

4.88

8.00

3.48

NS

NS

0.68

0.36

Nutrient management options

 NM1

244.84

293.31

22.44

24.55

84.07

89.21

73.18

80.8

13.51

13.73

2.13

2.32

 NM2

220.60

264.49

23.48

19.34

80.48

86.75

75.87

70.76

13.58

13.29

1.82

2.15

 NM3

275.01

227.06

21.04

22.87

88.16

79.62

71.06

77.44

13.28

13.63

1.90

2.26

 NM4

197.56

241.77

20.12

21.54

76.68

82.69

68.80

73.68

13.29

13.41

1.65

2.00

 SE m (±)

12.64

13.16

0.31

0.29

1.92

1.07

1.56

1.68

0.20

0.12

0.12

0.07

 CD (P = 0.05)

37.56

39.11

0.93

0.86

5.72

3.17

4.63

5.00

NS

0.36

0.36

0.21

Interaction effects

 SE m ( ±)

21.89

22.80

0.54

0.50

3.33

1.85

2.70

2.92

0.35

0.21

0.21

0.12

 CD (P = 0.05)

65.05

67.75

1.60

1.49

9.90

5.48

8.03

8.66

1.05

0.62

0.62

0.37

Back to article page