Table 2 Uni- and multivariate cox proportional hazard models for PFS.

From: Implications of unconventional histological subtypes on magnetic resonance imaging and oncological outcomes in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy

 

Univariate

Multivariate

HR

95% CI

P value

HR

95% CI

P value

Age (> 67)

1.23

0.72–2.08

0.4533

–

–

–

Initial PSA (> 7.6)

1.54

0.90–2.65

0.1117

–

–

–

Biopsy positive core % (> 27)

2.29

1.29–4.05

0.0032

1.11

0.59–2.10

0.7495

Biopsy GG (≥ 4)

4.93

2.88–8.45

 < 0.0001

3.02

1.68–5.43

0.0002

cT (3a)

5.9

3.25–10.72

 < 0.0001

3.13

1.62–6.04

0.0007

PI-RADS v2.1 score (≥ 4)

2.36

1.11–4.99

0.0137

1.04

0.48–2.28

0.9178

Presence of UH

3.26

1.87–5.69

 < 0.0001

2.31

1.29–4.15

0.005

pT (≥ 3a)

3.95

2.31–6.73

 < 0.0001

–

–

–

pN

4.16

1.01–17.09

0.106

1.56

0.36–6.72

0.5502

Pathological GG (≥ 4)

5.03

2.94–8.60

 < 0.0001

–

–

–

Tumor volume (> 2.29 mL)

4.23

2.31–8.4

 < 0.0001

2.7

1.25–5.81

0.0113

RM

3.27

1.91–5.67

 < 0.0001

2.43

1.36–4.33

0.0027

  1. PFS progression-free survival, PSA prostate-specific antigen, GG gleason grade group, PI-RADS prostate imaging reporting and data system, pT pathological T, pN pathological N, RM resection margin.
Back to article page