Table 4 Results for different involved architectures and data pipelines using the testing datasets in Config3. Significant values are in bold underline.

From: Automated PD-L1 status prediction in lung cancer with multi-modal PET/CT fusion

Model

Architecture

Mean AUC (95% CI)

Mean specificity (95% CI)

Mean sensitivity (95% CI)

ResNet

A

0.73 (0.72–0.75)

0.72 (0.71–0.75)

0.72 (0.70–0.75)

B

0.78 (0.76–0.81)

0.75 (0.73–0.78)

0.74 (0.72–0.77)

C

0.83 (0.81–0.86)

0.79 (0.76–0.81)

0.77 (0.75–0.80)

D

0.77 (0.74–0.79)

0.75 (0.72–0.77)

0.76 (0.74–0.78)

E

0.74 (0.72–0.76)

0.73 (0.70–0.75)

0.72 (0.70–0.73)

F

0.73 (0.70–0.75)

0.71 (0.70–0.74)

0.73 (0.71–0.75)

DenseNet

A

0.76 (0.73–0.78)

0.74 (0.72–0.76)

0.73 (0.71–0.76)

B

0.72 (0.71–0.74)

0.73 (0.71–0.75)

0.72 (0.70–0.75)

C

0.84 (0.82–0.88)

0.80 (0.78–0.83)

0.78 (0.75–0.81)

D

0.80 (0.78–0.83)

0.76 (0.75–0.80)

0.76 (0.74–0.79)

E

0.80 (0.77–0.81)

0.73 (0.70–0.75)

0.73 (0.73–0.78)

F

0.76 (0.75–0.79)

0.75 (0.72–0.77)

0.76 (0.73–0.78)

EfficientNet

A

0.78 (0.76–0.80)

0.74 (0.72–0.75)

0.73 (0.70–0.75)

B

0.80 (0.79–0.82)

0.75 (0.73–0.77)

0.73 (0.71–0.74)

C

0.74 (0.72–0.76)

0.73 (0.72–0.76)

0.73 (0.70–0.76)

D

0.83 (0.81–0.86)

0.80 (0.78–0.82)

0.80 (0.78– 0.81)

E

0.77 (0.74–0.80)

0.75 (0.73–0.78)

0.74 (0.72–0.76)

F

0.74 (0.72–0.76)

0.75 (0.73–0.77)

0.76 (0.74–0.78)