Table 5 The serial mediation effect of perceived social fairness and trust in government on the relationship between governance quality and subjective well-being.

From: Perceived social fairness and trust in government serially mediate the effect of governance quality on subjective well-being

Path

Point estimate

Product of coefficients

Bootstrapping

Bias-corrected 95% CI

Percentile 95% CI

SE

Z

Lower

Upper

P

Lower

Upper

P

Total effects

Governance quality → Subjective well-being

0.813

0.047

17.298

0.721

0.910

0.000

0.720

0.908

0.000

Direct effects

Governance quality → Subjective well-being

0.104

0.071

1.465

āˆ’ā€‰0.039

0.241

0.148

āˆ’ā€‰0.039

0.241

0.146

Governance quality → Trust in government

0.687

0.027

25.444

0.633

0.739

0.000

0.634

0.740

0.000

Governance quality → Perceived social fairness

0.626

0.020

31.300

0.588

0.667

0.000

0.587

0.666

0.000

Trust in government → Subjective well-being

0.335

0.053

6.321

0.235

0.442

0.000

0.234

0.441

0.000

Perceived social fairness → Subjective well-being

0.670

0.058

11.552

0.558

0.784

0.000

0.558

0.784

0.000

Perceived social fairness → Trust in government

0.282

0.024

11.750

0.236

0.329

0.000

0.236

0.328

0.000

Indirect effects

Governance quality → Subjective well-being

0.709

0.052

13.635

0.610

0.815

0.000

0.609

0.813

0.000

Specific indirect effects

Governance quality → Perceived social fairness → Subjective well-being

0.419

0.038

11.026

0.344

0.493

0.000

0.344

0.493

0.000

Governance quality → Trust in government → Subjective well-being

0.230

0.038

6.053

0.160

0.309

0.000

0.159

0.308

0.000

Serial indirect effects

Governance quality → Perceived social fairness →  Trust in government → Subjective well-being

0.059

0.010

5.900

0.041

0.081

0.000

0.040

0.080

0.000

  1. aUnstandardized estimates of 5000 bootstrap samples.