Table 5 The efficacy of VRP, VRC, VRM, HuRP, HuRC, and HuRM in predicting CKD in males and females was assessed by ROC.

From: AI-based segmentation of renal enhanced CT images for quantitative evaluate of chronic kidney disease

Males indicators

Area

SE

95% CI

P

Females indicators

Area

SE

95% CI

P

VRP

0.726

0.050

0.629–0.823

 < 0.001

VRP

0.813

0.052

0.711–0.914

 < 0.001

VRC

0.765

0.047

0.674–0.857

 < 0.001

VRC

0.851

0.046

0.761–0.942

 < 0.001

VRM

0.578

0.056

0.468–0.688

0.018

VRM

0.623

0.065

0.495–0.751

0.060

HuRP

0.912

0.028

0.857–0.967

 < 0.001

HuRP

0.904

0.034

0.837–0.971

 < 0.001

HuRC

0.952

0.019

0.915–0.989

 < 0.001

HuRC

0.934

0.026

0.883–0.984

 < 0.001

HuRM

0.772

0.046

0.682–0.874

 < 0.001

HuRM

0.840

0.045

0.752–0.928

 < 0.001

  1. SE, Standard error; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; VRP, renal parenchyma volume; VRC, renal cortex volume; VRM, renal medulla volume; HuRP, the CT values of renal parenchyma; HuRC, the CT values of renal cortex; HuRM, the CT values of renal medulla volume;
Back to article page