Table 2 Association analysis of studied genetic variants with GDM risk.

From: Functional genetic variants and susceptibility and prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus

Genotype

Case

Control

PHWE

Pa

Crude OR (95%CI)

Pb

Adjusted OR (95%CI)

Pc

rs17099985

 GG

396

461

0.82

0.966

1

 

1

 

 GT

144

164

0.92(0.44–1.93)

0.826

0.98(0.74–1.30)

0.899

 TT

14

15

0.94(0.44–2.02)

0.875

1.13(0.50–2.54)

0.766

 GT/TT

158

179

  

1.03(0.80–1.32)

0.833

0.99(0.76–1.30)

0.963

 GG/GT

540

625

  

1

 

1

 

 TT

14

15

  

0.93(0.44–1.94)

0.837

1.14 (0.51–2.54)

0.756

rs9283638

 CC

234

286

0.550

0.011

1

 

1

 

 CT

206

295

0.85(0.67–1.09)

0.211

0.87(0.67–1.13)

0.295

 TT

73

58

1.54(1.05–2.26)

0.029

1.46(0.97–2.21)

0.071

 CT/TT

279

353

  

0.97(0.77–1.22)

0.772

0.97(0.75–1.25)

0.805

 CC/CT

440

581

  

1

 

1

 

 TT

73

58

  

1.66(1.15–2.40)

0.007

1.57(1.06–2.32)

0.025

rs1742473

 TT

395

475

0.820

0.350

1

 

1

 

 TC

145

156

0.59(0.26–1.35)

0.214

1.14(0.86–1.52)

0.355

 CC

14

10

0.66(0.29–1.54)

0.341

2.04(0.84–4.94)

0.113

 TC/CC

159

166

  

1.15(0.89–1.49)

0.278

1.19(0.91–1.57)

0.209

 TT/TC

540

631

  

1

 

1

 

 CC

14

10

  

1.64(0.72–3.71)

0.239

1.97(0.82–4.76)

0.130

rs6798181

 TT

411

468

0.550

0.590

1

 

1

 

 TC

131

156

0.96(0.73–1.25)

0.743

0.98(0.74–1.39)

0.903

 CC

10

17

0.67(0.30–1.48)

0.321

0.71(0.31–1.63)

0.423

 TC/CC

141

173

  

0.93(0.72–1.20)

0.572

0.96(0.73–1.26)

0.745

 TT/TC

542

624

  

1

 

1

 

 CC

10

17

  

1.48(0.67–3.25)

0.333

0.72(0.31–1.63)

0.427

rs796749

 CC

271

340

0.130

0.948

1

 

1

 

 CT

202

244

1.04(0.81–1.33)

0.762

0.97(0.75–1.26)

0.823

 TT

45

57

0.99(0.65–1.51)

0.965

0.99(0.63–1.55)

0.955

 CT/TT

247

301

  

1.03(0.82–1.29)

0.806

0.97(0.76–1.25)

0.832

 CC/CT

473

584

  

1

 

1

 

 TT

45

57

  

0.98(0.65–1.47)

0.902

1.00(0.65–1.54)

1.000

  1. Significant values are in bold.
  2. HWE Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium test.
  3. aGenotype distribution difference tested by χ2.
  4. bUnconditional logistic regression analysis.
  5. cAdjusted for age, pre-BMI in logistic regression models.