Table 5 Comparative analysis of MPI, HI, EWI, and CR results from the present study with previous findings across diverse global regions.

From: Assessment of health risks associated with heavy metal contamination in selected fish and crustacean species from Temsah Lake, Suez Canal

site

No. of species

MPI

HI

EWI(Cd)

EWI(Pb)

EWI(Ni)

EWI(Hg)

EWI(Sn)

CR(Cd)

CR(Pb)

Reference 

   

Ad

Child

Ad

Child

Ad

Child

Ad

Child

Ad

Child

Ad

Child

Ad

Child

Ad

Child

 

Temsah Lak, Suez Canal

9

0.0002–6.62

0.10–0.61

0.22–1.33

0.08–0.77

0.17–1.68

1.50–7.51

3.29–16.43

0.87–4.66

1.90–10.20

ND–0.03

ND–0.07

0.08–2.69

0.17–5.88

1.04E-04–1.00E-03

2.27E-04–2.20E-03

2.66E-06–1.33E-05

5.81E-06–2.90E-05

Present study

Persian Gul, Iran

5

0.277–0.402

 

0.000127–0.000254

0.000265–0.000417

0.000188–

3.21E-07–6.67E-07

19

Black Sea, Turkey

5

0.14–0.563

0.135–0.763

0.0153–0.116

0.0244–0.241

0.065–0.035

0.022–0.204

76

Arabian Gul, Saudi Arabia

4

0.26–1.23

0.0013

0.01

4.19E-05–14.64E-05

0.05E-05–0.15E-05

77

Manzalah Lak, Egypt

5

1.06–1.25

4.95–5.83

7.42– 8.75

34.65–40.81

4.0E-04–4.70E-04

1.88E-03–2.21E-03

78

Damietta, North Egypt, Mediterranean coast

3

0.0171–0.15

0.028–0.56

0.007–1.295

0.28–0.798

79

Kirtankhola River,Bangladesh

12

0.052–0.77

0.0002–0.0054

0.0022–0.27

0.00079

0.0035

0.00216

0.016

2.36E-07–1.49E-06

1.04E-06–6.57E-06

3.56E-10–7.50E-09

1.57E-09–3.31E-08

80

Hurghada City, Red Sea, Egypt

5

0.64–12.81

0.174–1.35

0.817–6.312

0.35–2.17

1.68 ─–10.22

1.68–20.65

7.77–96.46

2,1─–11.76

9.94–54.95

8.59E-09–5.06E-05

7.57E-06–4.73E-05

2.70E-06–4.79E-04

2.52E-06–4.48E-04

81

Missouri, USA

2

0.2–0.38

0.01–0.02

0.17–1.16

0.06–0.48

0.32–5.18

2.09E-07–5.86E-07

82