Table 2 Summary of the NCCT segmentation metrics performance for the top four teams regarding the criteria both experts.
From: APIS: a paired CT-MRI dataset for ischemic stroke segmentation - methods and challenges
Team | Intersect | DICE↑ | SENS↑ | PREC↑ | HD↓ | AVD↓ | ALD↓ | LF1↑ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | icomaia | 17/36 | 0.20 ± 0.26 | 0.27 ± 0.32 | 0.18 ± 0.25 | 79.57 ± 40.58 | 32.41 ± 40.02 | 6.81 ± 4.15 | 0.17 ± 0.24 |
XMU | 10/36 | \( {{\it 0.13} \pm {\it 0.32}}\) | \( {{\it 0.01} \pm {\it 0.04}}\) | \( {{\it 0.14} \pm {\it 0.32}}\) | \( {{\it 104.83} \pm {\it 56.19}}\) | 26.97 ± 41.48 | 1.36 ± 1.22 | 0.24 ± 0.41 | |
LONGYING | 7/36 | 0.12 ± 0.32 | 0.00 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.19 | 107.29 ± 58.43 | \( {{\it 27.59} \pm {\it 43.94}}\) | 1.47 ± 1.67 | 0.15 ± 0.33 | |
LaTIM | 6/36 | 0.11 ± 0.32 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.01 | 120.59 ± 55.99 | 27.66 ± 44.69 | \( {{\it 1.42} \pm {\it 1.50}}\) | 0.16 ± 0.36 | |
R2 | icomaia | 20/36 | 0.20 ± 0.24 | 0.29 ± 0.32 | 0.17 ± 0.24 | 73.95 ± 38.55 | 30.69 ± 37.91 | 6.14 ± 3.97 | 0.21 ± 0.24 |
XMU | 10/36 | \( {{\it 0.10} \pm {\it 0.28}}\) | \( {{\it 0.01} \pm {\it 0.05}}\) | \( {{\it 0.15} \pm {\it 0.34}}\) | \( {{\it 117.07} \pm {\it 58.93}}\) | 27.20 ± 38.73 | \( {{\it 3.03} \pm {\it 2.90}}\) | 0.21 ± 0.38 | |
LONGYING | 6/36 | 0.09 ± 0.28 | 0.00 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.18 | 118.25 ± 53.35 | \( {{\it 27.81} \pm {\it 40.98}}\) | 2.86 ± 2.92 | 0.11 ± 0.30 | |
LaTIM | 4/36 | 0.08 ± 0.28 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.02 | 129.83 ± 53.11 | 27.94 ± 41.60 | 3.08 ± 3.05 | 0.11 ± 0.32 |
