Table 2 Comparing entropy measures numerically.
From: On analysis of silicon dioxide based on topological indices and entropy measure via regression model
\(Indices\backslash [m,n]\) | [1, 1] | [2, 2] | [3, 3] | [4, 4] | [5, 5] | [6, 6] | [7, 7] | [8, 8] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(ENT_{M_{1}}({SiO_{2}})\) | 1.812 | 2.416 | 2.769 | 3.019 | 3.213 | 3.372 | 3.506 | 3.622 |
\(ENT_{M_{2}}({SiO_{2}})\) | 1.796 | 2.404 | 2.758 | 3.009 | 3.204 | 3.363 | 3.497 | 3.613 |
\(ENT_{M_{4}}({SiO_{2}})\) | 1.793 | 2.403 | 2.758 | 3.009 | 3.204 | 3.363 | 3.497 | 3.613 |
\(ENT_{M_{5}}({SiO_{2}})\) | 1.801 | 2.406 | 2.759 | 3.010 | 3.204 | 3.362 | 3.496 | 3.612 |
\(ENT_{ReZG_1}({SiO_{2}})\) | 1.805 | 2.411 | 2.764 | 3.015 | 3.209 | 3.368 | 3.502 | 3.618 |
\(ENT_{ReZG_2}({SiO_{2}})\) | 1.811 | 2.415 | 2.768 | 3.018 | 3.212 | 3.371 | 3.505 | 3.621 |
\(ENT_{ReZG_3}({SiO_{2}})\) | 1.781 | 2.392 | 2.748 | 2.999 | 3.194 | 3.353 | 3.487 | 3.604 |
