Fig. 7
From: EEG β oscillations in aberrant data perception under cognitive load modulation
(A) The interactive effect of cognitive load and PAD on H-β power within the 400–450 ms time window in the Pz region. (B) A time-frequency map showing the difference between PAD + and PAD- under the low cognitive load condition in the Pz region. (C) The topographic maps of the average values in the 400–450 ms time window. (D) The interactive effect of cognitive load and PAD on H-β power within the 300–350 ms time window in the Pz region. (E) A time-frequency map showing the difference between PAD + and PAD- under the high cognitive load condition in the Pz region. (F) The topographic maps of the average values in the 300–350 ms time window (n.s. not significant; *p < 0.03; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). The main results of the time-frequency analysis are summarized in the Table 2.
