Table 9 Comparative analysis.

From: Quasirung orthopair fuzzy linguistic sets and their application to multi criteria decision making

Approaches

\(p\)

\(q\)

Score values

Ranking order

\({\mathcal{B}}_{1}\)

\({\mathcal{B}}_{2}\)

\({\mathcal{B}}_{3}\)

\({\mathcal{B}}_{4}\)

Redhu and Kumar59

\(2\)

\(3\)

\(0.2545\)

\(0.2748\)

\(0.2917\)

\(0.2895\)

\({\mathcal{B}}_{3} > {\mathcal{B}}_{4} > {\mathcal{B}}_{1} > {\mathcal{B}}_{1}\)

Ahmad et al.60

\(2\)

\(3\)

\(0.5239\)

\(0.5002\)

\(0.5633\)

\(0.5373\)

\({\mathcal{B}}_{3} > {\mathcal{B}}_{4} > {\mathcal{B}}_{1} > {\mathcal{B}}_{1}\)

Rahim et al.27

\(2\)

\(3\)

\(0.3578\)

\(0.3754\)

\(0.4257\)

\(0.4019\)

\({\mathcal{B}}_{3} > {\mathcal{B}}_{4} > {\mathcal{B}}_{1} > {\mathcal{B}}_{1}\)

Ali and Naeem61

\(2\)

\(3\)

\(0.3312\)

\(0.3521\)

\(0.3803\)

\(0.3692\)

\({\mathcal{B}}_{3} > {\mathcal{B}}_{4} > {\mathcal{B}}_{1} > {\mathcal{B}}_{1}\)