Table 6 A comparative study between the suggested FOFPID regulator and various published regulators.
Performance Criteria | Control strategies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOFPID | SC62 | Hybrid SMC-SC63 | MPC64 | MLP65 | |
Computational complexity | High | Low | Low | Medium | High |
Degree of durability | Very High | High | High | Medium | High |
Mathematical model dependency | No | High | High | High | No |
Simplicity of implementation | Very High | High | Very High | Medium | Very High |
Response time | Fast | Fast | Fast | Fast | Fast |
Robustness | Very High | Low | Medium | High | High |
Quality of the power generated | Excellent | Very good | Acceptable | Very good | Acceptable |
Quality of stator current | Excellent | Very good | Acceptable | Very good | Acceptable |
Settling time | Low | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
