Table 3 Assessing various algorithms for case 1: comparative performance analysis.
Transient response | Change in areas | MOA | FOA | GWO | SCA | DTBO1 | PFA29 | WCA40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time settling (Ts) | ∆F1 | 2.69 | 2.86 | 3.66 | 3.80 | 8.434 | 25.5 | 12.27 |
∆F2 | 3.21 | 3.93 | 4.09 | 4.85 | 10.90 | 23.2 | 29.46 | |
∆Ptie | 3.20 | 3.66 | 3.71 | 3.83 | 5.98 | 18.77 | 30.50 | |
Overshoot (Osh) | ∆F1 | 0.00024 | 0.00043 | 0.00007 | 0.00194 | 0.00004 | 0.00680 | 0.00280 |
∆F2 | 0.00023 | 0.00028 | 0.00024 | 0.00044 | 0.00027 | 0.01170 | 0.00110 | |
∆Ptie | 0.00007 | 0.00012 | 0.00072 | 0.00241 | 0.00000 | 0.00260 | 0.0007 | |
Undershoot (Ush) | ∆F1 | − 0.00061 | − 0.00086 | − 0.00600 | − 0.0102 | − 0.00059 | − 0.0245 | − 0.0109 |
∆F2 | − 0.00026 | − 0.00035 | − 0.00062 | − 0.0008 | − 0.00178 | − 0.0228 | − 0.0035 | |
∆Ptie | − 0.00601 | − 0.00564 | − 0.00803 | − 0.0087 | − 0.00084 | − 0.0044 | − 0.0022 |
