Table 1 Main features of the studied hunting grounds for each species (range given for percentages). (*0.0 represent percentage of wind farm cover lower than 0.05 but always higher than 0).

From: The contingent impact of wind farms on game mammal density demonstrated in a large-scale analysis of hunting bag data in Poland

 

Districts (n)

Settlements (%)

Crops

(%)

Forests

(%)

Water

(%)

Wind farm (%)*

Roe deer

478

0.0–50.3

37.1–99.4

0.0–43.6

0.0–27.3

0.0–58.6

Wild boar

469

0.0–50.3

37.1–99.4

0.0–43.6

0.0–27.3

0.0–58.6

Red fox

483

0.0–50.3

37.1–99.4

0.0–43.6

0.0–27.3

0.0–58.8

Racoon dog

463

0.0–27.9

37.1–99.2

0.0–43.6

0.0–27.3

0.0–58.8

European badger

464

0.0–27.9

37.1–99.2

0.0–43.6

0.0–27.3

0.0–58.8

European polecat

335

0.0–22.4

37.1–99.2

0.0–43.6

0.0–27.3

0.0–58.8

European hare

154

0.0–27.9

55.3–99.2

0.0–39.5

0.0–0.1

0.0–36.3