Table 3 Impact of Regional Digital Transformation on Employment Quality.
Variant | M(1) | M(2) | M(3) | M(4) | M(5) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMM | GMM | GMM | OLS | OLS | ||
Interpreted variable lagged one period term | L.Qualy | 0.827*** (0.101) | 0.834*** (0.039) | 0.269*** (0.082) | ||
Core explanatory variables | Dig | 0.153** (0.056) | −1.112* (0.660) | −0.806** (0.349) | −0.253* (0.202) | −0.642*** (0.199) |
Dig^2 | 2.539* (1.487) | 1.644*** (0.792) | 0.786*** (0.276) | 0.967*** (0.256) | ||
Control Variables | Intensity | −0.202 (0.479) | 0.082 (0.220) | 0.565*** (0.209) | ||
Stock | 0.568** (0.470) | 0.444*** (0.106) | 0.090 (0.108) | |||
Rd | −16.409 (88.982) | 57.424** (25.998) | 55.194** (23.974) | |||
Govern | −1.105* (1.135) | −1.303*** (0.253) | −0.556** (0.265) | |||
Income | −0.649* (0.737) | −0.312** (0.127) | 0.330** (0.152) | |||
Economy | 0.772*** (0.412) | 0.826*** (0.120) | 0.287** (0.140) | |||
cons | 0.057*** (0.025) | −0.020* (0.056) | 0.368*** (0.202) | 0.304*** (0.046) | 0.201*** (0.048) | |
Control | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
Year&Region | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |
Test p − value | Qualyit−1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
AR(1) | 0.019 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |||
AR(2) | 0.370 | 0.190 | 0.480 | |||
Hansen test | 0.325 | 0.343 | 0.576 | |||
Sargan test | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
