Table 4 Focus group voting results.

From: A mixed-methods survey and focus group study to understand researcher and clinician preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool

Item

Responses (n, %)

Total N

Yes

No

Abstain

Journal Transparency Tool User Feature Preferences

Should users of the journal transparency tool have to register to create an account?

6 (28.6)

13 (61.9)

2 (9.5)

21

Should the Journal Transparency Tool should be fully automated?

16 (80.0)

3 (15.0)

1 (5.0)

20

Should the Journal Transparency Tool be designed and hosted on a website, as opposed to a browser plugin?

19 (90.5)

1 (4.8)

1 (4.8)

21

Journal Transparency Tool Metrics Items

Should the Journal Transparency Tool include…

    

A metric reporting whether a journal is a member of CrossRef?

15 (78.9)

2 (10.5)

2 (10.5)

19

A metric reporting whether the journal is listed in the DOAJ?

18 (94.7)

2 (5.3)

0 (0.0)

19

A metric reporting whether the journal uses ORCID?

14 (77.8)

2 (11.1)

2 (11.1)

18

A metric reporting whether a Transparency and Openness Practices (TOP) factor score is available?

17 (100.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

17

A metric reporting whether article peer reviews are openly reported?

16 (94.1)

0 (0.0)

1 (5.9)

17