Fig. 4 | Scientific Reports

Fig. 4

From: Impact of bioinoculants on growth enhancement, physicochemical characteristics, biochemical profiles, and enzymatic defense mechanisms in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum)

Fig. 4

The graphical representation of the enzymatic activity of tomato fruit grown under screen house inoculated with biocontrol agents separately and in combinations. Figure (A) Biocontrol efficacy of different isolates of yeast (YFSL) and fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. (PFSL) on the antioxidant enzyme (POD LSD0.05=0.001) activity of tomato fruit grown under screen house. Figure (B) Biocontrol efficacy of different isolates of yeast (YFSL) and fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. (PFSL) on the antioxidant (SOD LSD0.05= 0.003 and APX LSD0.05=0.024) activity of tomato fruit grown in a screen house. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation, derived from the analysis of three replicates per sample. Letters highlight statistically significant differences among analyzed samples, based on a one-way ANOVA test (p < 0.05). Different letters within columns indicate differences according to Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (P ≤ 0.05). Whereas Control sterilized distilled water, Positive control Topsin M@ 200ppm, YFSL Yeast, PFSL fluorescent Pseudomonas, YFSL + PFSL combinations of yeast and fluorescent Pseudomonas spp.

Back to article page