Table 1 30 risks by author.
From: Developing a theoretical framework for enhancing green project approaches via Agile methodology
| Â | Stakeholders | No. | Risks |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Project manager | 1 | Inaccurate studies6 |
2 | Unpredictability18 | ||
3 | High cost of green projects45 | ||
4 | Lack of knowledge of green thought2 | ||
5 | Lack of interest in the life cycle of the building2 | ||
6 | Safety and accidents6 | ||
2 | Contractor | 1 | Delay in project delivery46 |
2 | Lots of waste during implementation8 | ||
3 | Lack of experience and quality45 | ||
4 | Poor site management6 | ||
3 | Labor | 1 | Labor productivity6 |
2 | Hazards facing workers on site16 | ||
4 | Designer | 1 | Poor team experience1 |
2 | Poor in design6 | ||
3 | Errors in deign7 | ||
4 | Clashes in the design16 | ||
5 | Delay in project delivery47 | ||
6 | Lack of knowledge of materials related to thermal and acoustic comfort15 | ||
7 | Not knowing the materials that extend the life of the building18 | ||
5 | Owner | 1 | Non-cooperation48 |
2 | Continuous change16 | ||
3 | Hesitation in making decisions6 | ||
4 | Lack of a clear financing strategy7 | ||
5 | Lack of knowledge of the value of green projects48 | ||
6 | Failure to set flexible programs to reduce waste47 | ||
6 | Consultants | 1 | Errors in the pricing process18 |
2 | Error in the review process48 | ||
7 | Governmental institution | 1 | Change in regulations6 |
2 | Lack of awareness of the importance of green projects8 | ||
3 | Lack of interest in feasibility studies15 |
