Table 5 Showing the creation of the 30 indicators from the 30 risks.
From: Developing a theoretical framework for enhancing green project approaches via Agile methodology
| Â | Stakeholders | No. | Risks | Indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|
A | Project manager | 1 | Inaccurate studies | (Experts role) feasibility studies/ green projects |
2 | Unpredictability | (Time) proactive system/green projects | ||
3 | High cost of green projects | (Cost) AGILE methodology / green projects | ||
4 | Lack of knowledge of green thought | (Flexibility in change) AGILE methodology / green projects | ||
5 | Lack of interest in the life cycle of the building | (Flexibility in change) AGILE methodology / life cycle buildings | ||
6 | Safety and accidents | (Flexibility in change) AGILE methodology / safety and quality control | ||
B | Contractor | 1 | Delay in project delivery | (Time control process) Agile / project handover date |
2 | Lots of waste during implementation | (Competencies) AGILE / cost of waste | ||
3 | Lack of experience and quality | (Environnemental context) Project implementation / quality | ||
4 | Poor site management | (Continuous monitoring) AGILE approach / site management | ||
C | Labor | 1 | Labor productivity | (Continuous monitoring) AGILE approach / labor productivity |
2 | Hazards facing workers on site | (Reducing the errors) safety / site | ||
D | Designer | 1 | Poor team experience | (Time) specialized team / studies |
2 | Poor in design | (Owner) professional team leader / innovative designs | ||
3 | Errors in deign | (Continuous improvement) design processes / reducing errors | ||
4 | Clashes in the design | (Coordination) conflicts / drawings | ||
5 | Delay in project delivery | (Time management system) delays / drawings | ||
6 | Lack of knowledge of materials related to thermal and acoustic comfort | (Material) environmentally friendly / both thermal and acoustic comfort | ||
7 | Not knowing the materials that extend the life of the building | (Material) environmentally friendly / extending the life cycle of the building | ||
E | Owner | 1 | Non-cooperation | (Quality of the project) cooperation / stakeholders |
2 | Continuous change | (Reducing waste) parameters / continuous change | ||
3 | Hesitation in making decisions | (Owner) several suitable alternatives / preventing hesitations | ||
4 | Lack of a clear financing strategy | (Contract) financing conditions and strategies/organizing financing for the project | ||
5 | Lack of knowledge of the value of green projects | (Green projects) high value / implement it in his project | ||
6 | Failure to set flexible programs to reduce waste | (Flexible programs) wasting / design stage | ||
F | Consultants | 1 | Errors in the pricing process | (Competencies) pricing process / preventing errors |
2 | Error in the review process | (Competencies) supervision process / preventing errors | ||
G | Governmental institution | 1 | Change in regulations6 | (Green projects) value / developing legislation |
2 | Lack of awareness of the importance of green projects8 | (Green projects) value / apply it in their projects | ||
3 | Lack of interest in feasibility studies15 | (Feasibility studies) great success / project |
