Table 4 Age-adjusted prevalence of emergency transport cases.

From: Enhancing healthcare planning using population data generated from mobile phone networks in Futaba County after the Great East Japan earthquake

 

National†

Hirono

Naraha

Tomioka

Kawauchi

Okuma・Futaba

Katsurao・Namie

Crude prevalence, %

4.51

3.63

5.21

5.19

7.47

2.16

3.48

Estimated population-based age-adjusted prevalence (95% CI), %††

-

3.77 (3.25–4.28)

5.05 (4.37–5.73)

6.41 (5.28–7.54)

6.42 (5.32–7.53)

2.08 (1.19–2.98)

3.43 (2.74–4.11)

National population census-based age-adjusted prevalence (95% CI), % *††

4.58 (4.57–4.58)

4.37 (3.78–4.96)

6.41 (5.58–7.23)

8.29 (6.97–9.6)

6.77 (5.59–7.95)

10.45 (7.11–13.8)

6.36 (5.21–7.51)

Δ Age-adjusted prevalence (95% CI), %**

–

−0.60 (−1.38–0.18)

−1.36 (−2.43–−0.28)

−1.88 (−3.6–−0.15)

−0.35 (−1.96–1.27)

−8.37 (−11.84–−4.91)

−2.93 (−4.27–−1.60)

  1. Confidence interval (CI).
  2. †Age-adjusted prevalence of emergency transport cases in Japan was calculated based on the 2020 national emergency transport data.
  3. †† Age adjustment was performed using the 2015 model in Japan.
  4. * Based on 2020 National Population Census data.
  5. ** Difference in age adjusted prevalence between the estimated population-based prevalence and census-based prevalence.
Back to article page