Table 1 Overview of credibility, metacognition, and belief ratings per condition.

From: Knowledge of legal professionals about age trends in false memory propensity: a vignette study

 

Spontaneous

Suggestion-induced

6-years-old

n = 22

22-years-old

n = 32

6-years-old

n = 25

22-years-old

n = 23

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

M

SD

Credibility ratings

 Credibility assessmenta

4.53

1.44

4.38

1.20

4.33

1.01

4.24

0.96

 4. How likely do you think Vicky’s father is guilty?

5.14

1.28

5.03

1.15

5.12

1.05

4.57

0.84

 5. How likely do you think is it that Vicky formed a false memory?

3.27

1.39

2.25

1.22

3.60

1.44

3.30

1.43

Metacognition ratings

 8. How much was your judgment influenced by intuition?

3.32

1.67

2.97

1.93

4.16

1.46

3.17

1.83

 9. How much was your judgment influenced by experience?

4.73

1.67

4.66

1.84

4.88

1.36

3.87

1.55

 10. How much was your judgment influenced by knowledge?

4.50

1.63

3.97

1.51

3.56

1.66

3.65

1.77

 11. How much did Vicky’s age influence your credibility ratings?

4.64

1.68

3.94

1.52

5.12

1.36

3.52

1.53

 12. How much did the fact that Vicky had not had contact with any other person/had called her grandmother before she talked to the police, influence your credibility ratings?

5.55

1.22

4.91

1.42

5.60

1.32

4.09

1.28

 13. How useful do you think it would be to ask a memory expert for his or her opinion on the credibility of Vicky’s statement?

4.55

2.06

3.63

2.20

4.72

2.19

3.74

1.98

Belief ratings

 14. In your opinion, compared to adults, are children generally more or less likely to develop a spontaneous false memory?

4.55

1.26

4.09

1.57

5.00

1.26

4.91

1.04

 15. Compared to adults, are children generally more or less likely to develop a suggestion-induced false memory?

5.18

1.10

4.78

1.54

5.12

1.24

5.00

1.21

  1. Ratings were evaluated on a 7-point Likert scale; higher ratings reflect stronger endorsement.
  2. aCredibility assessment score (mean score of items 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7).