Table 5 Comparative analysis of field calibration and empirical models against SM150 sensor.
Treatment | Correlation coefficient | MAE | REA | RMSE | MAPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCM vs. SMT150 | 0.987* | 0.78 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 5.21 |
EM 2 vs. SMT150 | 0. 987* | 1.59 | 1.07 | 0.32 | 10.51 |
Treatment | Correlation coefficient | MAE | REA | RMSE | MAPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCM vs. SMT150 | 0.987* | 0.78 | 0.39 | 0.23 | 5.21 |
EM 2 vs. SMT150 | 0. 987* | 1.59 | 1.07 | 0.32 | 10.51 |