Table 7 Performance comparison.
From: Hybrid optimization for efficient 6G IoT traffic management and multi-routing strategy
Metric | Traditional method | QCA method | QCA + MoM method | DRL method | QGA-ACO method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deployment coverage (%) | 75 | 85 | 90 | 92 | 95 |
Average communication delay (ms) | 35 | 25 | 20 | 18 | 15 |
Energy consumption per node (J) | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1 | 0.9 |
Cluster stability index | 0.85 | 0.9 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
CH selection efficiency (%) | 80 | 85 | 88 | 92 | 95 |
Routing path length (m) | 150 | 130 | 120 | 115 | 110 |
Routing energy consumption (J) | 2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.3 |
Data accuracy (%) | 80 | 85 | 88 | 90 | 92 |
Network lifetime (months) | 12 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 20 |
Adaptability to mobility (%) | 70 | 80 | 85 | 90 | 95 |
