Table 1 Results of LMMs for the relationship between fGCM concentrations and social bond variables.
Relationship between mean fGCM concentrations and social bond variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Model predictors | Estimate | SE | t | p |
Fixed effects | ||||
 (Intercept) | 251.97 | 24.61 | 10.23 | < 0.001 |
 Groom | 7.74 | 2.48 | 3.11 | 0.02 |
 (Intercept) | 182.99 | 66.94 | 2.73 | 0.01 |
 Proximity | 1.82 | 0.98 | 1.84 | 0.27 |
 (Intercept) | 238.01 | 39.79 | 5.98 | < 0.001 |
 Approach | 2.34 | 1.27 | 1.83 | 0.27 |
 (Intercept) | 237.89 | 82.77 | 2.87 | 0.01 |
 Play | 8.14 | 10.36 | 0.78 | 0.79 |
 (Intercept) | 297.17 | 157.25 | 1.88 | 0.06 |
 Number of partners | 0.18 | 7.86 | 0.02 | 0.98 |
Interactions | Â | Â | f | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Groom*sex | Â | Â | 0.83 | 0.79 |
Proximity*sex |  |  | 4.26 | < 0.001 |
Approach*sex | Â | Â | 0.06 | 0.80 |
Play*sex | Â | Â | 0.02 | 0.80 |
Number of affiliative peers*sex | Â | Â | -0.04 | 0.79 |
Play*relatedness |  |  | -5.06 | < 0.001 |
Number of affiliative peers*relatedness |  |  | -8.13 | < 0.001 |