Table 2 Performance comparison of different backbone networks.
From: Lightweight tea bud detection method based on improved YOLOv5
Backbone network | P/% | R/% | \(\:{\text{m}\text{A}\text{P}}_{0.5}\)/% | Parameter/M | FLOPs/G | Weights/MB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSPDarkNet-53 | 79.48 | 81.24 | 84.12 | 7.01 | 15.76 | 13.8 |
ShuffleNetV2 | 75.89 | 74.95 | 78.95 | 4.44 | 8.50 | 8.9 |
PP-LCNet | 79.17 | 66.25 | 74.43 | 4.40 | 8.62 | 8.8 |
MobileNetV3 | 79.62 | 66.46 | 74.92 | 3.75 | 6.45 | 7.6 |
GhostNetV1 | 76.36 | 73.06 | 78.09 | 7.23 | 10.32 | 14.4 |
EfficientNetV2 | 82.35 | 77.04 | 84.44 | 5.40 | 5.58 | 10.6 |
