Table 1 Variable definition and descriptive statistics.

From: Collaboration among governments, agribusinesses, and rural households for improving the effectiveness of conservation tillage technology adoption

Variable

Items

Mean

Std. Dev.

Min

Max

Adoption effectiveness

Economic performancea

Effect of conservation tillage on improving production entities’ income (1–5)

3.145

1.071

1

5

Ecological performancea

Effect of conservation tillage on improving ecological environment (1–5)

3.437

1.094

1

5

Social performancea

Effect of conservation tillage on improving relations between villagers (1–5)

4.023

0.77

1

5

Collaboration capacity

Constructive engagement

Financial contribution (RMB)

2556.971

6607.739

0

60,000

Labor contribution (person × day)

340.341

1108.583

0

10,350

Meeting organization

6.191

7.885

0

48

Training participation

41.139

35.461

0

100

Shared visiona

Village committee election (1–5)

4.092

897

1

5

One-case-one-discussion system responsiveness (1–5)

3.25

1.235

1

5

Public affairs commitment (1–5)

3.267

1.214

1

5

Joint execution and regulationb

Supervision measure (0 = no, 1 = yes)

89

296

0

1

Punishment measures (0 = no, 1 = yes)

216

388

0

1

Personnel allocations (0 = no, 1 = yes)

949

21

0

1

Regulatory implementation (0 = no, 1 = yes)

85

343

0

1

Environmental characteristics

Soil erosion

Proportion of cultivated land area with soil erosion (%)

0.288

0.349

0

1

Land scale

The logarithm of the village’s cultivated land area (mu)

6.187

1.188

3.689

8.613

Village location

Logarithm of the distance (li) from the village to the township government

2.307

0.856

0.693

4.615

Mechanism variables

Violation frequencya

Frequency of villagers violating rules and regulations (1–5)

1.559

706

1

4

Cross-village governance capacityb

Whether the cross-village governance capacity of soil erosion has been improved (1 = yes 0 = no)

324

469

0

1

Farmer satisfactiona

Production entities’ satisfaction with soil and water conservation (1–5)

3.983

845

1

5

  1. aIndicators have been measured on a 5-point scale: 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree.
  2. bIndicators have been measured on a 0–1 scale: 0 = no, 1 = yes.