Table 5 Percentage error of estimated dominant modes in the 34-bus microgrid for different active power droop gains using ESPRIT, Prony, Matrix Pencil, and SID techniques.

From: A kurtosis-ESPRIT algorithm for RealTime stability assessment in droop controlled microgrids

mp ×10− 7

System modes

ESPRIT

Kurtosis measure

mp×10− 7

Prony

Estimated modes

% Error

Estimated modes

% Error

Real

Imag

Real

Imag

0.5

−5.63 ± 10.612i

−5.5748 ± 10.67i

0.98

0.546

4.0043

0.5

−5.4713 ± 10.23i

2.818

3.59

0.8

−4.3018 ± 13.559i

0.98

2.17

1.1

−3.3729 ± 15.928i

5.52

1.019

0.8

−4.26 ± 13.27i

−4.282 ± 13.557i

0.51

2.162

5.3532

Matrix pencil

0.5

−5.4674 ± 10.227i

2.889

3.627

1.1

−3.57 ± 16.092i

−3.485 ± 16.24i

2.38

0.919

5.5959

0.8

−4.3021 ± 13.559i

0.988

2.17

1.1

−3.3728 ± 15.928i

5.52

1.019

Subspace identification

0.5

−5.716 ± 11.161i

1.5275

5.1733

0.8

−4.336 ± 13.706i

1.784

3.285

1.1

−3.738 ± 16.462i

4.705

2.299