Table 6 Percentage error in estimating dominant modes at different X/R ratios and active power droop gains for the 3-bus benchmark.

From: A kurtosis-ESPRIT algorithm for RealTime stability assessment in droop controlled microgrids

mp× 10− 4

X/R ratio

System modes

Estimated modes

% Error Real

% Error Imag

Kurtosis measure

1.1

Unchanged (reference case)

−7.59 ± 51.05i

−7.504 ± 51.16i

1.17

0.215

7.6248

1.35

−5.37 ± 56.97i

−5.201 ± 57.09i

3.25

0.21

5.64

1.1

Line 1 X/R

Increased by 20%

−8.56\(\:\pm\:\)50.05i

−8.508 ± 50.4i

0.607

0.699

9.31

1.35

−6.5544\(\:\pm\:\) 56i

−6.686 ± 56.12i

2.0078

0.214

6.6

1.1

Line 2 X/R

Increased by 20%

−7.516\(\:\pm\:\)50.7i

−7.596 ± 50.86i

1.064

0.3155

8.3

1.35

−5.31\(\:\pm\:\)56.58i

−5.198 ± 56.76i

2.109

0.318

5.7

1.1

Line 1 X/R

decreased by 20%

−6.48\(\:\pm\:52.04\)i

−6.397 ± 52.44i

1.28

0.768

7

1.35

−4.04\(\:\pm\:57.87\)i

−3.87 ± 58.078i

4.207

0.359

4.56

1.1

Line 2 X/R

decreased by 20%

−7.64\(\:\pm\:51.54\)i

−7.61 ± 51.79i

0.392

0.485

8.33

1.35

−5.38\(\:\pm\:57.55\) i

−5.287 ± 57.58i

1.72

0.052

5.73