Table 7 Environmental impact assessment of chromium recovery from leather tanning residues using various impact categories associated with the ReCiPe method (FU = 1 kg of chromium recovered).

From: Environmental and energy analysis of chromium recovery from residual tanned leather using alkaline thermal hydrolysis

Impact category

Unit

Total

Sodium hydroxide

Tap water

Energy production from biogas

Climate change Human Health

DALY

2.43E-06

2.35E-06

2.11E-08

5.37E-08

Ozone depletion

DALY

3.16E-09

3.15E-09

2.88E-12

1.95E-12

Human toxicity

DALY

5.95E-07

5.76E-07

7.81E-09

1.06E-08

Photochemical oxidant formation

DALY

2.35E-10

2.14E-10

1.95E-12

1.93E-11

Particulate matter formation

DALY

1.25E-06

1.18E-06

9.01E-09

5.59E-08

Ionizing radiation

DALY

3.79E-09

3.68E-09

9.06E-11

2.18E-11

Climate change Ecosystems

species.yr

1.37E-08

1.33E-08

1.19E-10

3.04E-10

Terrestrial acidification

species.yr

5.44E-11

4.93E-11

3.83E-13

4.73E-12

Freshwater eutrophication

species.yr

3.73E-11

3.65E-11

4.97E-13

3.60E-13

Terrestrial ecotoxicity

species.yr

2.86E-11

2.80E-11

2.96E-13

3.18E-13

Freshwater ecotoxicity

species.yr

5.32E-11

5.15E-11

3.75E-13

1.33E-12

Marine ecotoxicity

species.yr

9.89E-12

9.58E-12

7.18E-14

2.44E-13

Agricultural land occupation

species.yr

1.05E-09

1.03E-09

1.09E-11

1.11E-11

Urban land occupation

species.yr

5.63E-10

5.54E-10

4.29E-12

4.63E-12

Natural land transformation

species.yr

4.94E-10

4.84E-10

3.27E-12

5.91E-12

Metal depletion

$

1.03E-02

9.49E-03

1.94E-04

5.94E-04

Fossil depletion

$

7.39E-02

7.27E-02

6.71E-04

5.42E-04