Table 8 Comparative environmental impact of recovered chromium vs. raw chromium production.

From: Environmental and energy analysis of chromium recovery from residual tanned leather using alkaline thermal hydrolysis

Impact category

Unit

Chromium recovered

Raw chromium

% Change

Climate Change, Human Health

DALY

2.43E-06

3.78E-05

−93.57%

Ozone depletion

DALY

3.16E-09

3.46E-09

−8.67%

Human toxicity

DALY

5.95E-07

6.09E-06

−90.23%

Photochemical oxidant formation

DALY

2.35E-10

3.00E-09

−92.17%

Particulate matter formation

DALY

1.25E-06

1.76E-05

−92.90%

Ionizing radiation

DALY

3.79E-09

4.98E-08

−92.39%

Climate change, Ecosystems

species.yr

1.37E-08

2.14E-07

−93.60%

Terrestrial acidification

species.yr

5.44E-11

6.30E-10

−91.37%

Freshwater eutrophication

species.yr

3.73E-11

4.63E-10

−91.94%

Terrestrial ecotoxicity

species.yr

2.86E-11

2.65E-10

−89.21%

Freshwater ecotoxicity

species.yr

5.32E-11

4.16E-10

−87.21%

Marine ecotoxicity

species.yr

9.89E-12

7.88E-11

−87.45%

Agricultural land occupation

species.yr

1.05E-09

9.26E-09

−88.66%

Urban land occupation

species.yr

5.63E-10

5.87E-09

−90.41%

Natural land transformation

species.yr

4.94E-10

6.81E-09

−92.75%

Metal depletion

$

1.03E-02

2.13E + 00

−99.52%

Fossil depletion

$

7.39E-02

1.20E + 00

−93.84%