Table 3 Comparison of GO-PANCMA NFs SPE-HPLC-DAD method with other reported methods for detection of antibiotic residues.
Adsorbents | Detection method | Analyte | Sample | LOQ | LOD | %RR | RSD (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GO-polyethylene terephthalate NFs | µ-SPE-HPLC-UV | Tetracycline, Cefotaxime | Honey | 47.1and 10 µg/kg | 15.3and 3.0 µg/kg | 89–98 | 3.6–5.6 | |
Activated carbon-polyacrylonitrile (PAN) NFs | DSPE-HPLC-DAD | Ciprofloxacin, Danofloxacin, Enrofloxacin | Surface water | 0.53–2.17 µg/L | 0.05–0.20 µg/L | 90–99 | 3–4 | |
Polyvinyl alcohol triethoxysilane -Fe3O4@SiO2 | SPE- UV–VIS | Sulfamethoxazole, Trimethoprim | Surface water | 0.1–50 mg/L | 0.0317–0.247 mg/L | 95.1–98.2 | ˂ 3 | |
C-nanofiber-coated magnetic nanoparticles | MSPE-HPLC-DAD | Chloramphenicol, Tetracycline | Milk | 9.63 and 9.83 ng/mL | 3.02 and 3.52 ng/mL | 94.6–105.4 | ˂ 4 | |
Polystyrene-PAN NFs | PFSPE-HPLC-MS/MS | Enrofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin | Milk | 0.53 − 1.29 ng/mL | 0.16–0.39 ng/mL | 88.68–97.63 | ˂ 7 | |
Fe3O4-GO-Agarose-Chitosan composite | MSPE-HPLC-UV | Streptomycin, Gentamicin | Chicken egg | 0.3–0.6 µg/kg | 0.1–0.19 µg/kg | 94 | 2.5 | |
Molecularly imprinted Fe3O4@POSS nanoparticles | MI-MSPE-HPLC-UV | Ofloxacin, Enrofloxacin, Danofloxacin | Milk | 5.84–41.38 ng/ml | 1.76–12.42 ng/mL | 75.6–102.9 | < 11 | |
GO-PANCMA NFs | SPE-HPLC-DAD | Oxytetracycline, Amoxicillin | Surface water, milk | 4.8–5.0 µg/L | 1.46–1.50 µg/L | 87.6–106.3 | 1.1–4.7 | This study |
