Table 3 Comparison of metrics of different compression methods on each image.
From: Deep Learning Image Compression Method Based On Efficient Channel-Time Attention Module
Picture number | Compression method | PSNR(dB) | MS-SSIM | LPIPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
a1 | Original Image | — | — | — |
b1 | JPEG | 27.3 | 0.78 | 0.60 |
c1 | JPEG2000 | 29.1 | 0.82 | 0.58 |
d1 | WebP | 28.5 | 0.80 | 0.54 |
e1 | BPG | 29.6 | 0.84 | 0.56 |
f1 | ETAM | 30.5 | 0.87 | 0.21 |
a2 | Original Image | — | — | — |
b2 | JPEG | 26.9 | 0.77 | 0.61 |
c2 | JPEG2000 | 29.0 | 0.81 | 0.57 |
d2 | WebP | 28.4 | 0.79 | 0.53 |
e2 | BPG | 29.5 | 0.83 | 0.55 |
f2 | ETAM | 30.7 | 0.88 | 0.22 |
a3 | Original Image | — | — | — |
b3 | JPEG | 27.1 | 0.76 | 0.63 |
c3 | JPEG2000 | 28.9 | 0.80 | 0.59 |
d3 | WebP | 28.3 | 0.78 | 0.55 |
e3 | BPG | 29.4 | 0.83 | 0.57 |
f3 | ETAM | 30.6 | 0.86 | 0.24 |
a4 | Original Image | — | — | — |
b4 | JPEG | 27.4 | 0.79 | 0.62 |
c4 | JPEG2000 | 29.2 | 0.83 | 0.56 |
d4 | WebP | 28.6 | 0.80 | 0.52 |
e4 | BPG | 29.7 | 0.85 | 0.54 |
f4 | ETAM | 30.8 | 0.89 | 0.20 |
a5 | Original Image | — | — | — |
b5 | JPEG | 27.0 | 0.78 | 0.64 |
c5 | JPEG2000 | 29.3 | 0.82 | 0.57 |
d5 | WebP | 28.7 | 0.81 | 0.53 |
e5 | BPG | 29.8 | 0.85 | 0.55 |
f5 | ETAM | 31.0 | 0.90 | 0.21 |
