Table 2 Means and standard deviations of scales, and bivariate correlations with confidence intervals between the scales.

From: The role of self-care and self-compassion in networks of resilience and stress among healthcare professionals

Variable

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

 

1. Optimism

5.02 (1.37)

            

2. Self-compassion

0.48**

3.22 (0.62)

           
 

[0.37, 0.58]

            

3. Social support

0.32**

0.22**

10.25 (2.06)

          
 

[0.19, 0.44]

[0.09, 0.34]

           

4. Self-efficacy

0.40**

0.45**

0.25**

4.06 (0.56)

         
 

[0.28, 0.51]

[0.34, 0.55]

[0.12, 0.37]

          

5. Problem-focused coping

0.35**

0.45**

0.37**

0.36**

2.84 (0.48)

        
 

[0.23, 0.46]

[0.34, 0.55]

[0.25, 0.48]

[0.24, 0.47]

         

6. Self-care

0.29**

0.49**

0.35**

0.31**

0.34**

3.77 (0.70)

       
 

[0.16, 0.41]

[0.38, 0.59]

[0.23, 0.47]

[0.19, 0.43]

[0.22, 0.45]

        

7. Micro-stressors

− 0.15*

− 0.25**

− 0.22**

0.01

− 0.13

− 0.35**

79.09 (35.70)

      
 

[-0.27, − 0.01]

[-0.38, − 0.12]

[-0.34, − 0.08]

[-0.12, 0.15]

[-0.26, 0.00]

[-0.47, − 0.23]

       

8. Mental health problems

− 0.33**

− 0.49**

− 0.22**

− 0.30**

− 0.27**

− 0.61**

0.38**

12.35 (5.07)

     
 

[-0.44, − 0.20]

[-0.59, − 0.38]

[-0.34, − 0.08]

[-0.42, − 0.18]

[-0.39, − 0.14]

[-0.68, − 0.51]

[0.26, 0.49]

      

9. Emotional exhaustion

− 0.14*

− 0.34**

− 0.15*

− 0.16*

− 0.14*

− 0.35**

0.48**

0.49**

28.83 (11.19)

    
 

[-0.27, − 0.00]

[-0.45, − 0.21]

[-0.28, − 0.02]

[-0.29, − 0.02]

[-0.27, − 0.00]

[-0.46, − 0.22]

[0.37, 0.58]

[0.38, 0.58]

     

10. Depersonalization

− 0.17*

− 0.29**

− 0.19**

− 0.16*

− 0.10

− 0.15*

0.25**

0.15*

0.53**

9.59 (6.11)

   
 

[-0.30, − 0.04]

[-0.41, − 0.16]

[-0.31, − 0.05]

[-0.29, − 0.03]

[-0.24, 0.03]

[-0.28, − 0.01]

[0.11, 0.37]

[0.01, 0.27]

[0.42, 0.62]

    

11. Personal accomplishment

0.35**

0.34**

0.34**

0.26**

0.30**

0.27**

− 0.02

− 0.27**

− 0.20**

− 0.17*

46.41 (7.22)

  
 

[0.23, 0.46]

[0.21, 0.45]

[0.22, 0.46]

[0.13, 0.38]

[0.17, 0.42]

[0.14, 0.39]

[-0.15, 0.12]

[-0.39, − 0.14]

[-0.32, − 0.06]

[-0.30, − 0.04]

   

12. Work Engangement

0.43**

0.41**

0.28**

0.41**

0.42**

0.33**

− 0.15*

− 0.36**

− 0.28**

− 0.23**

0.51**

4.94 (1.15)

 
 

[0.31, 0.53]

[0.29, 0.52]

[0.15, 0.40]

[0.29, 0.52]

[0.30, 0.52]

[0.20, 0.44]

[-0.28, − 0.02]

[-0.47, − 0.23]

[-0.40, − 0.15]

[-0.35, − 0.10]

[0.40, 0.60]

  

13. Work-life balance

0.09

0.35**

0.16*

0.21**

0.15*

0.42**

− 0.38**

− 0.42**

− 0.58**

− 0.24**

0.09

0.30**

3.22 (0.92)

 

[-0.05, 0.22]

[0.22, 0.46]

[0.03, 0.29]

[0.08, 0.34]

[0.02, 0.28]

[0.30, 0.52]

[-0.49, − 0.26]

[-0.52, − 0.30]

[-0.66, − 0.48]

[-0.36, − 0.11]

[-0.04, 0.23]

[0.17, 0.42]

 
  1. Scale means and standard deviations (in brackets) are presented on the diagonal of the correlation matrix. Below, the bivariate correlations between each variable pair are shown with the 95% confidence interval (values in square brackets) for each bivariate correlation. The confidence interval is a plausible range of population correlations that could have caused the sample correlation. Asterisks indicate statistically significant correlations with * indicating p < 0.05, and ** indicating p < 0.01. N = 212.
Back to article page