Table 3 Experimental data results.
From: A novel deep learning model based on YOLOv5 optimal method for coal gangue image recognition
P | R | mAP | Par | FLOPs | Times | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YOLOv5 basic | Coal | 0.963 | 0.949 | 0.973 | – | – | – |
Rock | 0.963 | 0.959 | 0.977 | – | – | – | |
All | 0.963 | 0.954 | 0.975 | 7.03 Mb | 16.0 G | 6.9 ms | |
YOLOv5-CARAFE | Coal | 0.951 | 0.961 | 0.972 | – | – | – |
Rock | 0.961 | 0.966 | 0.979 | – | – | – | |
All | 0.956 | 0.956 | 0.976 | 7.16 Mb | 16.4 G | 8.0 ms | |
YOLOv5-MCA | Coal | 0.965 | 0.947 | 0.974 | – | – | – |
Rock | 0.959 | 0.959 | 0.979 | – | – | – | |
All | 0.971 | 0.936 | 0.976 | 7.06 Mb | 16.1 G | 7.7 ms | |
YOLOv5 optimal | Coal | 0.962 | 0.959 | 0.98 | – | – | – |
Rock | 0.971 | 0.96 | 0.975 | – | – | – | |
All | 0.966 | 0.959 | 0.977 | 7.19 Mb | 16.6 G | 9.0 ms |