Table 3 Comparison of mean results of Microbiological parameters (HBN, MF, DHA) in control soils/substrates and after EM application obtained by different researchers.

From: Application of effective microorganisms for Littoral zone restoration in eutrophic reservoirs

Parameter

Control

Appl. of EM

Reference

HBN

(106 CFU/g)

0.0614a

0.07045a

This study

4.78

6.93

Higa and Wididana, 199160

5.477

13.962

Kaczmarek et al., 200861

30.93b

50.3b

Ghazal et al., 201162

10.32b

5.34b

Frąszczak et al., 201263

1.2c

6.033c

Fan et al., 201637

~ 2000

~ 5000

Du et al., 202064

~ 0.0000683

~ 0.000205

Borowiak et al., 202165

27.0

38.3

Bauza-Kaszewska et al., 202266

27.8

28.3

Breza-Boruta and Bauza-Kaszewska, 202367

MF

(103 CFU/g)

0.185a

0.205a

This research

9.42

39.1

Higa and Wididana, 199160

117.1

198.1

Kaczmarek et al., 200861

1.513

3.02

Ghazal et al., 201162

3530

1090

Frąszczak et al., 201263

~ 105

~ 175

Fan et al., 201637

~ 3.93

~ 3.85

Borowiak et al., 202165

DHA (mg TPF/kg·h)

41.5a

40.5a

This research

~ 73.0

~ 65.0

Park and Kremer, 200768

7.89

7.57d, 8.01e

Mayer et al., 201069

~ 9.0

~ 10.8

Tang et al., 201070

16.36

26.80

Ghazal et al., 201162

7.64f, 2.72g

9.92f, 2.86g

Sharma et al., 201771

~ 0.0175

~ 0.0142

Borowiak et al., 202165

~ 86.0

~ 113.0

Elbagory, 202372

~ 200.0

~ 314

Li et al., 202342

  1. a - median value, b - total bacterial counts (TBN), c - in 4 out of 5 series similar results in both groups, resulting from the last series, d - EM spraying, e - EM spraying + Bokashi balls, f - Calendula field, g - Marigold field, variability from 270 to 350 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Rhodotorula benthica, Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacillus thuringiensis), ~ - approximate values, read from the charts.