Table 3 Efficacy and safety of aspirin compared to placebo in preventing primary VTE.

From: Aspirin for the extended prevention of venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Variable

RR

[95% CI]

z

P-value

τ2

τ

I2

P at Q test

QoE

Efficacy

 VTE3,4,7

0.80

[0.70; 0.92]

− 3.13

0.001

0

0

45.8% [0.0%; 82.0%]

0.136

Moderate

 DVT3,7

0.72

[0.56; 0.92]

− 2.61

0.009

0

0

0.0% [0.0%; 89.6%]

0.964

Moderate

 PE3,7

0.73

[0.54; 0.97]

− 2.12

0.034

0.004

0.066

54.5% [0.0%; 87.0%]

0.111

Moderate*

 All-cause mortality3,7

0.97

[0.86; 1.09]

− 0.42

0.676

0

0

0.0% [0.0%; 89.6%]

0.839

Low†‡

 Cardiovascular mortality3,7

0.93

[0.79; 1.09]

− 0.85

0.398

0

0

0.0% [0.0%; 89.6%]

0.823

Low†‡

 VTE-related mortality3

0.42

[0.24; 0.72]

− 3.16

0.001

0

0

0.0% [0.0%; 99.9%]

0.889

Moderate

Safety

 Bleeding3,7

1.17

[1.01; 1.37]

2.15

0.031

0.009

0.097

19.8% [0.0%; 91.7%]

0.287

Moderate

 Major bleeding3,7

1.13

[1.00; 1.28]

2.11

0.034

0.001

0.039

0.0% [0.0%; 89.6%]

0.382

Moderate

 Trasfusion3

1.04

[0.73; 1.49]

0.25

0.802

0.048

0.219

71.3% [0.0%; 93.5%]

0.062

Low*‡

 Stroke3,7

1.04

[0.75; 1.43]

0.25

0.803

0

0

0.0% [0.0%; 89.6%]

0.771

Low†‡

 Cardiovascular AEs3,7

0.98

[0.90; 1.06]

− 0.43

0.664

0

0

0.0% [0.0%; 89.6%]

0.456

Low†‡

 Cardiac AEs3,7

1.06

[0.96; 1.16]

1.26

0.207

0

0

0.0% [0.0%; 89.6%]

0.647

Low†‡

 Myocardial infarction3,7

1.02

[0.88; 1.18]

0.37

0.711

0

0

43.3% [0.0%; 83.0%]

0.171

Low†‡

  1. RR relative risk, 95%CI 95% confidence interval, z z-score measures how many standard deviations a data point is from the mean, τ2 between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis, τ standard deviation estimate of effect sizes in random-effects meta-analysis, I2 measures percentage variation across studies due to heterogeneity, Q test Cochran’s Q test assesses heterogeneity among study results, QoE quality of evidence. *Downgraded one level for inconsistency (such as heterogeneity of estimates of effects across trials)12. Although a low I2 value usually suggests low heterogeneity, the quality of evidence for this observation remains uncertain. This uncertainty arises from a broad I2 confidence interval, which hints at potential undetected heterogeneity. Despite the reported absence of between-study variance (τ2 = 0) and no variation in effect estimates (τ = 0), and an I2 of 0%, the QoE for the outcome was prudently downgraded one level12. Downgraded one level for Imprecision (for example, 95% confidence intervals are wide and include or are close to null effect)12. High QoE (): The authors are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate QoE (): The authors are moderately confident in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low QoE (): The authors’ confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect12.