Table 8 optimum values for different case studies in mitigating generation cost for a 33-bus system using the ILOA algorithm.
Variables | Case_1 | Case_2 | Case_3 | Case_4 | Case_5 | Case_6 | Case_7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\({P}_{G1}\) | 165.2085 | – | – | 267.3759 | – | 325.7942 | 318.9853 |
\({P}_{G2}\) | 197.5207 | – | – | 193.0362 | – | 198.8326 | 197.7649 |
\({P}_{G3}\) | 97.9826 | – | – | 98.87462 | – | 99.9988 | 99.1754 |
\({P}_{G4}\) | – | 274.1286 | – | 260.5027 | 339.7109 | – | 301.8093 |
\({P}_{G5}\) | – | 660.9784 | – | 619.5326 | 747.2081 | – | 715.0782 |
\({P}_{G6}\) | – | 479.4947 | – | 437.4269 | 539.0284 | – | 488.5013 |
\({P}_{G7}\) | – | – | 462.0945 | – | 437.2187 | 441.8608 | 437.8096 |
\({P}_{G8}\) | – | – | 641.2894 | – | 543.8913 | 580.4096 | 562.3857 |
\({P}_{G9}\) | – | – | 779.4851 | – | 702.1872 | 698.0731 | 665.7028 |
\({P}_{Loss}(\text{kW})\) | 0.7118 | 9.6017 | 33.0889 | 11.74892 | 54.2446 | 34.9691 | 72.2125 |
\({Q}_{Loss}(\text{kVAr})\) | 0.661943 | 7.682567 | 26.02592 | 8.3609 | 40.9826 | 25.8093 | 49.5107 |
\(\text{Cost}(\text{\$}/\text{hr})\) | 19,254.64 | 70,900.83 | 97,915.95 | 89,443.86 | 1,68,662.74 | 1,15,061.66 | 1,87,645.04 |
