Table 4 MGWR with OLS and GWR model parameter comparison.

From: Unveiling spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of ecosystem services to optimize the ecological zoning management in the Luo river basin

Model accuracy

WY

CS

SR

HQ

CESI

OLS

AICc

2906.3536

144.3765

1555.6365

− 624.2709

− 1181.9974

R2

0.4427

0.9207

0.9057

0.9158

0.5423

Adjusted R2

0.4287

0.9184

0.9030

0.9134

0.5292

GWR

AICc

2646.1258

83.6474

1428.4418

− 754.9975

− 1344.954

R2

0.8086

0.9454

0.9484

0.9546

0.7792

Adjusted R2

0.7822

0.9376

0.9412

0.9481

0.7479

MGWR

AICc

2476.5226

− 47.4825

1359.0155

− 844.1769

− 1434.3544

R2

0.9220

0.975

0.963

0.9700

0.8460

Adjusted R2

0.9020

0.968

0.956

0.9640

0.8250