Table 5 Comparison of detection results.

From: Artificial intelligence enhanced electrochemical immunoassay for staphylococcal enterotoxin B

Refernces

Method

Technique

\(R^2\)

Concentration

LOD

RSD

Time

Sample

Application

Range

Consumed

Volume

Scenario

43

Immuno-

Colloidal gold

10–1000 ng/mL

10 ng/mL

A few min

100 μL

Rapid

Chromatographic

Labeling

Screening

Test strip

44

LFA

Colloidal gold

1–1000 ng/mL

10 ng/mL

10 min

100 μL

Food

Labeling,

Double antibody

Testing

Sandwich

45

ELISA

0.9824–

0–20 ng/mL

1–5 ng/mL

8-10 h

0.998

SEs

46

ELISA

Sandwich

0.9935

1–512 ng/mL

0.3 ng/mL

100 μL

Nbs-ELISA

47

Sliding microtubes

Sandwich

0–100 ng/mL

0.5 ng/mL

30 min

Laboratory

Immunoassay

Chip

48

ELISA

Sandwich

0.25–100 ng/mL

0.5–0.75 ng/mL

A few hours

100 μL

Meat

Immunoassay

SEA

49

Electrochemical

GR-Ch-AuNPs

10 ng/mL

5 ng/mL

35 min

On-site

Sandwich

Modified

− 10 μg/mL

Detection

Immunoassay

Electrode

50

Fluorescence

Carbon Dot

0.9849

0.5–10 ng/mL

0.5 ng/mL

15 min

50 μL

Food

Resonance

Acriflavine

energy Transfer

Nano-assembly

Testing

(FRET)

Detection

51

Electrochemical

Platinum

0.989

1 ng/mL

1 ng/mL

3-8.8%

Nanoparticle

Modification,

Immunosensor

Hydrogen evolution

− 1 μg/mL

Suppression method,

Indirect sandwich

ELISA

52

ELISA

Sandwich

0.5 ng/mL

45 min

1 mL

Food

Immunoassay

Testing

53

ELISA

Sandwich

0.1 ng/mL

1 ng/mL

A few hours

100 μL

Food safety,

Immunoassay

− 1 μ/mL

Clinical diagnosis

SEG

54

Biosensor

Electroosmotic

5–100 ng/mL

5 ng/mL

11.50%

A few min

filtration

55

Biosensor

Surface plasmon

0.99

1–1000 ng/mL

10 ng/mL

5–8 min

40 μL

Food

resonance (SPR)

contamination

This work

Electrochemical

Machine learning

0.998

1 ng/mL–10 μg/mL

1 ng/mL

3.62–9.21%

2 min

20 μL

Multiple

Immunosensor

Application

Scenarios