Table 8 Comparison results for different models for DSII.

From: Multi release software reliability modelling incorporating fault generation in detection process and fault dependency with change point in correction process

Model No

\(MSE_d\)

\(MSE_c\)

MSE

\(R_d^2\)

\(R_c^2\)

\(R^2\)

\(MRE_d\)

\(MRE_c\)

MRE

AIC

1

24.14768

11.84240

17.99504

0.908761

0.957381

0.933071

0.704478

0.320755

0.512616

55.13163

2

23.97141

18.16542

21.06841

0.911707

0.926558

0.919132

0.644737

0.490800

0.567768

57.81217

3

24.20788

12.28588

18.24688

0.908749

0.954612

0.931681

0.706166

0.335887

0.521027

55.36790

4

24.49344

11.38663

17.94004

0.907511

0.959133

0.933322

0.718279

0.291497

0.504888

57.07959

5

24.46040

11.90931

18.18486

0.907139

0.956003

0.931571

0.719332

0.322111

0.520722

57.31002

6

5.574522

3.674572

4.624547

0.981919

0.989476

0.985698

0.107176

0.105971

0.106574

38.03343

7

10.66465

7.833082

9.248865

0.964108

0.973818

0.968963

0.150694

0.275678

0.213186

47.81651

8

2.933252

3.352293

3.142772

0.990987

0.990377

0.990682

0.069112

0.111226

0.090169

31.46679

9

3.896608

2.204027

3.050318

0.988359

0.993579

0.990969

0.081567

0.086433

0.084000

34.95918

  1. Bold letters indicate that the proposed model gives better results than existing models for the respective goodness of fit criterion.
Back to article page