Table 6 Comparisons of RMO and IRMO versus reported results for R.T.C France PV cell considering triple-DM.

HTS⁷⁶

1.9880E−03

1.5560E−03

1.1860E−03

2.810E−04

GO⁷⁶

1.0020E−03

9.9793E−04

9.8393E−04

6.4133E−06

FPA⁷⁶

1.4310E−03

1.26510E−03

1.10830E−03

1.1270E−04

EVO⁷⁶

5.3610E−03

2.3850E−03

1.0830E−03

1.6440E−03

TLbABC⁷⁸

–

–

1.50480E−03

–

SCA⁸⁰

–

–

9.86863E−04

–

FPO⁷⁹

–

–

1.93434E−03

–

TLBO⁸¹

–

–

1.52057E−03

–

CSA⁸²

–

–

1.22E−03

–

ABC⁷⁷

–

–

1.2848E−03

–

Comprehensive learning PSO⁸³

–

–

1.3991E−03

–

Generalized opposition TLBO⁸⁴

–

–

4.4321E−03

–

RMO

3.54822 E−03

1.70195E−03

1.030096 E−03

6.66011E−04

Proposed IRMO

1.6436 E−03

1.12068 E−03

9.86812 E−04

2.00229E−04