Table 5 Comparative analysis of the proposed aggregation operators with current operators.

From: Quality of basketballs of international level sports using an intelligent decision algorithm involving multiple experts

Existing operators

Ranking results

Weighted averaging mean

\(0.72, 0.63, 0.77, 0.66, 0.61\)

Weighted geometric mean

\({0.49,0.37,0.55}, 0.42, 0.39\)

PFPAAA83

Cannot handle prioritization among CPFVs

PFPAAG83

Not adaptable for circular picture fuzzy data

PFWA84

Designed for classical PFS, not CPFV

PFWG84

Geometric aggregation; no prioritization handling

PFHWA81

Hesitant fuzzy set focused; incompatible

PFHWG81

Hesitant framework mismatch

PFFWA

Fermatean fuzzy environment, not CPFV

PFFWG

Fermatean fuzzy environment, not CPFV

PFDWA

Designed for different divergence measures