Table 4 Detection frequency and average frame gaps for a single pen from use case scenario 1. During the ten-hour observation period the majority of the animal IDs have been detected. IDs 44 and 48 (marked with *) were undetected in one video, which led to a considerable increase in the average frame gap.
From: Multistage pig identification using a sequential ear tag detection pipeline
ID | Frequency | Avg. Frame Gap | ID | Frequency | Avg. Frame Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 | 5346 | 112 | 38 | 2919 | 18 |
27 | 1345 | 49 | 39 | 3245 | 13 |
28 | 4799 | 183 | 40 | 3995 | 17 |
29 | 2502 | 26 | 41 | 5323 | 17 |
30 | 7975 | 9 | 42 | 5985 | 10 |
31 | 4196 | 17 | 43 | 3645 | 25 |
32 | 909 | 61 | 44 | 3540 | 384* |
33 | 3177 | 68 | 45 | 4052 | 12 |
34 | 4529 | 18 | 46 | 1707 | 36 |
35 | 4734 | 13 | 47 | 4784 | 13 |
36 | 4800 | 12 | 48 | 2581 | 388* |
37 | 2409 | 26 | 49 | 3385 | 20 |